:: domaining business blog // Domaining for Domainers

Archive for the ‘gripe site’ Category

“Occupy” is the new “Sucks”

July 20, 2012Domaining, Domainnamewire, gripe site, occupy, Policy & Law, udrpComments Off on “Occupy” is the new “Sucks”

The term “occupy” can be similar to “sucks” in a domain name — an indication of a gripe site.

The first element of the uniform domain name dispute resolution policy (UDRP) that a complainant must prove is that the domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark in which the complainant has rights.

But what about when it comes to satirical or gripe sites?

Generally speaking, the first element of the policy can be overcome by the respondent if the domain name alone contains something that makes it clear that it’s not owned or operated by the complainant.

So if you owned, it’s pretty clear that any site attached to that isn’t owned by Coke.

But if you own and had a gripe site on it, it’s not clear until you visit the site that it’s not owned by Coke.

The first domain should be considered not confusingly similar but the second would. (That’s not to say the second wouldn’t fail on another element.)

You can throw words like,, etc. in replacement to as examples of words that would indicate the site isn’t run by the complainant.

Now you can add “occupy” to that list, at least according to one panelist.

Panelist Michael A. Albert just handed down a ruling in a case for and He found that the domain names are not identical or confusingly similar to the Chicago Tribune mark:

Given the circumstances of this case and in particular the heavy and nearly universal coverage of the Occupy Movement within the national and local media, the Panel holds that the Occupy Movement is so well known within the relevant area (both parties being from Chicago, Illinois, in the United States) that the Domain Names are not confusingly similar to Complainant’s mark. The Panel agrees with Respondent’s assertion that no reasonable person in the Chicago area would confuse the Domain Names with Complainant or Complainant’s publication.

© 2011.

Get Certified Parking Stats at DNW Certified Stats.

No related posts.

What Not To Do with a “Sucks” Domain Name

July 25, 2011Domaining, Domainnamewire, gripe site, Policy & Law, udrpComments Off on What Not To Do with a “Sucks” Domain Name

Here’s a “sucks” UDRP the complainant will easily win.

Living Spaces Furniture, LLC recently filed a UDRP against the owner of

Thinking this was perhaps a site created by a disgruntled customer, I typed in the URL and found this:

This will be a slam dunk for the furniture company.

You can generally own a “sucks” domain name under a couple circumstances:

1. You actually use it to criticize the company

2. You don’t benefit financially from it

I’ve seen gripe sites that show ads — that’s a big no-no. But this example is worse. It’s clear that the owner wants to sell the domain name, and they’re even making a not-so-veiled threat that it will be used against the company if the domain is never purchased.

This is one of those cases that I don’t blame the complainant for filing a UDRP even if the registrant offers to sell the domain name for less than the cost of filing a UDRP. I say go for it.

© 2011.

Get Certified Parking Stats at DNW Certified Stats.

Related posts:

  1. isn’t international
  2. How to generate bad publicity for your company
  3. Ashley Furniture Gets Cocky, Loses Case for