NameStarter.com :: domaining business blog // Domaining for Domainers

Archive for the ‘.jobs’ Category

Rare bird .jobs domain spotted in the wild

September 25, 2012.jobs, .jobs domain, Domaining, Domainnamewire, UncategorizedComments Off on Rare bird .jobs domain spotted in the wild

A fashion brand actually uses the rare .jobs domain name.

I went to the mall with my daughter this past weekend when something suddenly stopped me in my tracks.

I pulled out my smartphone and snapped a picture.

My six-year-old daughter looked at me with a confused expression and asked, “What, dad? What is it?”

“Something rarer than a unicorn,” I told her.

Indeed, this is what I saw:

Yes, that’s a .jobs domain. It’s the first time I think I’ve seen one in the wild since 2008.

There are only a small number of .jobs domains registered and in use by the people they were actually created for. The other tens of thousands are just essentially sploards. (I just made that term up. Instead of splog, it stands for spam job boards.) (I guess that should be “spoards”, since there’s not ‘l’ in it like blog.)


© DomainNameWire.com 2012. This is copyrighted content. Do not republish.

Latest domain news at DNW.com: Domain Name Wire.

No related posts.

.Jobs foes to ICANN: Hurry up, open up, and get a spine

December 7, 2011.jobs, Domaining, Domainnamewire, employ media, Policy & LawComments Off on .Jobs foes to ICANN: Hurry up, open up, and get a spine

Coalition calls out ICANN for apparent lack of progress in dealing with Employ Media.

The .Jobs Charter Compliance Coalition, a group of job boards opposed to expansion of the .jobs namespace, has sent a letter (pdf) to ICANN’s CEO and Board of Directors asking it to hurry up, open up, and get a spine.

Hurry Up
The letter admonishes ICANN for an apparent lack of progress in its arbitration proceedings with .jobs registry Employ Media, or at least not updating the community on the status. It states that it’s been over four months since ICANN submitted its answer to arbitration, but it doesn’t appear that a mandatory third arbitrator has been assigned to the case:

Unfortunately, this consensual delay plays right into the hands of the rogue registry operator. As the arbitration idles in its dormant state, Employ Media and its alliance partner DirectEmployers Association (“DirectEmployers”) have aggressively expanded the reach of non-compliant Dot Jobs Universe, which was the very basis for the issuance of the breach notice. This continuing delay only emboldens the defiance of Employ Media and DirectEmployers in the operation of their non-compliant program, which inflicts continuing harm on members of the human resources community and other parties adversely affected by Employ Media’s unwarranted expansion of the .JOBS Top-Level Domain (“TLD”).

Open Up
The coalition also blasts ICANN for failing to disclose a number of communications regarding .jobs and its “beta test” of using non company .jobs domain names for a job board. Among other concerns, the coalition said ICANN should have disclosed certain communications before a public comment period for an amendment to the .jobs contract.

Get a Spine
The coalition also claims that ICANN needs to get a spine when it comes to enforcing its contracts, tying in with the planned launch of new top level domains:

In his address at the opening ceremony at ICANN’s March 2011 meeting in San Francisco, U.S. Commerce Assistant Secretary Larry Strickling emphasized that ICANN and its Board needed to focus on developing improvements to its accountability and transparency. However, given the launch of the new gTLD initiative in which ICANN will be responsible for the oversight of hundreds of new gTLDs, the deficient manner in which ICANN has prosecuted a clear case of non-compliance raises serious doubts as to the credibility of ICANN’s governance methods, and runs counter to Secretary Strickling’s goal that ICANN maintain a foundation of strong accountability and transparency.

If nothing else I expect ICANN will now disclose more information about the progress of the arbitration on its web site. But I also expect it to keep this swept under the rug until after the new TLD application window opens.


© DomainNameWire.com 2011.

Get Certified Parking Stats at DNW Certified Stats.

Related posts:

  1. .Jobs Foes Question ICANN Commitment to Contract Compliance
  2. .Jobs Foes Get Cold Shoulder From ICANN
  3. Job Boards Launch Another Attack on .Jobs Registry

.Jobs Foes Get Cold Shoulder From ICANN

August 6, 2011.jobs, Domaining, Domainnamewire, Policy & LawComments Off on .Jobs Foes Get Cold Shoulder From ICANN

Response to disclosure request mostly redacted.

The .JOBS Charter Compliance Coalition, a group of companies opposed to the expansion of who can register .jobs domain names, has gotten the cold shoulder from ICANN in a recent request.

The group made a request through ICANN’s Documentary Information Disclosure Policy (DIDP) for information on how and why the IANA database entry about the “purpose” of .jobs was changed. ICANN responded by releasing the support ticket chain including the request from Employ Media LLC, but almost all of it is redacted.

First there’s the original ticket/request from Employ Media’s Ray Fassett in May asking for the purpose to be changed from “Reserved for human resource managers” to “Reserved to serve needs of the international human resource management community.”

Then there’s a note from Nadia Sokolova, IANA Request Specialist at ICANN, to Kim Davies, Manager of Root Zone Services, asking if the update can be made.

Everything else after that is redacted until a note from Kim Davis to Fassett saying the change has been made.

In other words, basically everything the Coalition wanted to find out was absent.

I can’t imagine what information that was redacted shouldn’t actually be public, but perhaps the redaction was due to the ongoing legal battle between Employ Media and ICANN.


© DomainNameWire.com 2011.

Get Certified Parking Stats at DNW Certified Stats.

Related posts:

  1. ICANN May Shut Down .Jobs Registry
  2. .Jobs Operator Says ICANN “Publicly Defamed” It
  3. .Jobs Foes Question ICANN Commitment to Contract Compliance

Job Boards Launch Another Attack on .Jobs Registry

May 12, 2011.jobs, Domaining, Domainnamewire, employ media, Policy & LawComments Off on Job Boards Launch Another Attack on .Jobs Registry

Monster, CareerBuilder, and others write open letter to ICANN.

The .Jobs Charter Compliance Coalition, whose membership consists of online job boards, has sent an “open letter” to ICANN regarding Employ Media’s request for arbitration over .jobs.

The Coalition says that its letter is to “address the Request’s numerous inconsistencies, omissions and mischaracterizations” in Employ Media’s request for arbitration.

The letter states:

The Coalition believes that Employ Media simply cannot provide any reasonable response that would explain away the indisputable fact that the Charter does not permit the operation of job boards that advertise job openings for multiple employers. The Charter clearly envisions internal human resource management personnel utilizing .JOBS domains exclusively for their own companies and organizations. The .JOBS domain was not meant as a forum for Employ Media and its conspiring alliance partner DirectEmployers Association (“DirectEmployers”) to operate a massive job board – which is exactly what the Dot Jobs Universe represents. The registration of tens of thousands of second-level domain names by one bulk registrant for this improper purpose is entirely inconsistent with both the intent of the .JOBS TLD and ICANN’s policies, and represents a terrible precedent for the anticipated launch of the new gTLD initiative.

I think this is true, although it also seems to me that ICANN’s board gave the green light to Employ Media to go forward with its universe.jobs initiative. Someone (or an entire board) was asleep at the wheel there.

The group also points out how Employ Media completely disregarded the charter by starting universe.jobs without permission. Employ Media later called it a “beta test”:

The beta test utilized noncompanyname domain name designations when that practice was clearly prohibited at the time by the Registry Agreement. Although Employ Media portrays the beta test as an experiment taken in the best interests of the .JOBS community, the more accurate explanation is that both Employ Media and DirectEmployers were conspiring to develop methods to monetize the .JOBS TLD to their own financial advantage.

You can read the full letter here (pdf).


© DomainNameWire.com 2011.

Get Certified Parking Stats at DNW Certified Stats.

Related posts:

  1. ICANN May Shut Down .Jobs Registry
  2. Yep, .Jobs Dispute is Now Going to Cost YOU Money
  3. .Jobs Foes Question ICANN Commitment to Contract Compliance

Fight Over .Jobs is About to Cost Domain Name Owners

May 3, 2011.jobs, Domaining, Domainnamewire, employ media, Policy & LawComments Off on Fight Over .Jobs is About to Cost Domain Name Owners

Legal bills could start coming in as two sides bicker of .jobs domain name.

An argument between .jobs registry Employ Media and ICANN has already cost some legal dollars, and I have a feeling it’s about to get more expensive.

Although the two parties are technically in a process of “Cooperative Engagement”, recent correspondence is not favorable. In fact, the parties are sending correspondence about correspondence.

On April 22 counsel for Employ Media sent a stern letter to ICANN complaining that ICANN had published communication between the two parties:

My client, Employ Media, and I are most disappointed by the fact that your client, ICANN, posted certain communications related to the current Cooperative Engagement process, and that it did so without an opportunity for discussion, despite my request that you not proceed with posting our communications until I had reverted to you. We are equally disappointed by the fact that, during all of the various discussions I had with you, you never once raised with me the prospect that ICANN would be posting any of the communications between the parties. In light of this apparent bad faith action on ICANN’s part, Employ Media is q uestioningwhether any hope remains for a full and fair exchange of ideas regarding a resolution of its dispute with ICANN.

ICANN’s counsel responded on April 26, stating that publishing the correspondence was important to meeting its transparency objectives. It also said that one of the complaints ICANN made to Employ Media in its breach notice was that the .jobs community wasn’t fully aware of changes being made to .jobs…so publishing these letters is important for making the .jobs community aware.


© DomainNameWire.com 2011.

Get Certified Parking Stats at DNW Certified Stats.

Related posts:

  1. Yep, .Jobs Dispute is Now Going to Cost YOU Money
  2. .Jobs Operator Says ICANN “Publicly Defamed” It
  3. Domain Registries Blast ICANN Over .Jobs Breach Notice

.Jobs Operator Says ICANN “Publicly Defamed” It

March 18, 2011.jobs, Domaining, Domainnamewire, Policy & LawComments Off on .Jobs Operator Says ICANN “Publicly Defamed” It

Employ Media says ICANN “publicly defamed” it in breach notice.

.Jobs registry Employ Media has struck back at ICANN after the latter sent it a breach notice.

In a letter to ICANN, Employ Media Vice‐President & General Counsel Brian Johnson wrote:

It goes without saying that all of us here at Employ Media, and indeed many in the international human resource management community, are extremely surprised and disappointed with ICANN’s complete reversal of position in this matter. We are specifically disappointed with ICANN’s decision to publicly defame Employ Media and its contractual partners, which serves no purpose except to cause irreparable harm to Employ Media and others who have built their business around ICANN and the Internet governance framework for which it is responsible.

Indeed, it did seem like a “complete reversal” and this issue will create a lot of work for ICANN’s new contractual compliance deputy.

Johnson also requested an immediate phone conference “to address the damage caused by the Notice and
to further initiate discussions relating to the issues identified therein.”

The group is invoking “Cooperative Engagement” under Section 5.1(a) of the registry agreement.


© DomainNameWire.com 2011.

Get Certified Parking Stats at DNW Certified Stats.

Related posts:

  1. What Would Happen if Employ Media Loses .Jobs?
  2. ICANN May Shut Down .Jobs Registry
  3. Battle Over .Jobs is Growing

ICANN May Shut Down .Jobs Registry

February 28, 2011.jobs, Domaining, Domainnamewire, employ media, Policy & LawComments Off on ICANN May Shut Down .Jobs Registry

ICANN threatens to shut down .jobs, even after approving its “registry service”.

ICANN has notified .jobs registry Employ Media LLC that it is in breach of its contract at ICANN, and the contract is subject to cancellation if the breach isn’t corrected within 30 days.

That this breach letter (pdf) is going out now shows a massive failure on the part of ICANN. (More on that in a bit.)

In a letter dated February 27, ICANN informs Employ Media that it has failed to establish policies that conform with the “intent and purpose” of the .Jobs Charter.

ICANN notes that the rules for registered a .jobs domain name make it so that basically anyone can register domains, not just human resources professionals. For example, any member of Society of Human Resource Management (SHRM) can register domains. But the letter states that all it takes to become a member of is a $40 payment.

ICANN also addresses Universe.jobs, a scheme by which thousands of niche job boards are being created:

It is our understanding that one registrant, who is a member of SHRM, registered forty thousand second-level domain names in the .JOBS TLD for use on this job board. It appears that Employ Media and SHRM, through the Direct Employers Association, intend to use the .JOBS TLD primarily to compete with other internet job boards. Such use is inconsistent with the purpose stated in the .JOBS Charter and represented to the ICANN community. As opposed to numerous, international, human resource management professionals registering second-level .JOBS domain names, it appears one US-based registrant is registering thousands of second-level .JOBS domain names. These registrations appear to serve the interests of the registrant or company causing the registrations, as well as Employ Media and SHRM rather than the interests of the human resource management professionals.

So why is this a massive failure on the part of ICANN?

Because this issue has been in ICANN’s face for a long, long time. ICANN’s board approved a “registry service” that enabled the universe.jobs project. The organization even reviewed its Board’s decision.

Now, at the end of February, after all of this has gone into effect, ICANN’s compliance department brings it up with Employ Media?

It would seem that this should have been addressed a long time ago if it was an issue. ICANN was clearly aware of what was going on.

Although I don’t approve of the backdoor approach .jobs has taken to basically turn itself into a gTLD, I can also sympathize with Employ Media throwing their hands up in the air at this point and saying “WTF?”

(via DomainIncite)


© DomainNameWire.com 2011.

Get Certified Parking Stats at DNW Certified Stats.

Related posts:

  1. Battle Over .Jobs is Growing
  2. .Jobs Changes Are Not an Example of the Power of New Top Level Domains
  3. The .Jobs Backlash Has Begun

ICANN To Review .Jobs Decision

September 21, 2010.jobs, Domaining, Domainnamewire, icann, Policy & LawComments Off on ICANN To Review .Jobs Decision

.Jobs expansion plans hit a snag, but it’s probably minor.

Following an outcry from the online job board industry, ICANN’s Board Governance Committee (BGC) agreed to reconsider opening up the .jobs space carte blanche.

I doubt anything will come of this reconsideration request, even if the BGC recommends to the Board that it reverse its decision. We all know what happened after ICANN’s board reversed its original decision on .xxx. That issue is still carrying on today.

What it could do, however, is slow down the .jobs expansion.

The controversial .jobs plan allows the .jobs registry to offer generic second level domain names. Currently only companies can register their exact second level domain name in .jobs, e.g. att.jobs. That means we could see Nursing.jobs and NYC.jobs.

(via DomainIncite)


© DomainNameWire.com 2010.

Get Certified Parking Stats at DNW Certified Stats.

Related posts:

  1. CareerBuilder and Monster Want to Stop .Jobs Domain Expansion
  2. .Jobs Expansion Approved, .Travel to Release 1 and 2 Character Domains
  3. The .Jobs Backlash Has Begun

CareerBuilder and Monster Want to Stop .Jobs Domain Expansion

August 31, 2010.jobs, Domaining, Domainnamewire, Policy & LawComments Off on CareerBuilder and Monster Want to Stop .Jobs Domain Expansion

Group forms to object to .jobs expansion.

A group calling itself The .JOBS Charter Compliance Coalition is asking ICANN’s board to reconsider its decision to open up the .jobs top level domain name to non-company name registrations. The coalition’s members include major employment web sites such as Monster and CareerBuilder, along with a number of associations.

In a letter (pdf) to the Committee of the Board on Reconsideration, the group argues that:

-The .jobs phased allocation program violates the .jobs charter
-The members of the coalition will be harmed by the by the expansion of the .JOBS space beyond employers without any of the customary and usual protections against abusive and infringing registrations
-Other people will also be harmed by the expansion
-The board’s decision should be stayed pending the outcome of reconsideration
-ICANN’s staff-prepared comment summary was flawed

A number of job boards have been vocal opponents of the plan. Much of the opposition suggests that the purpose and charter of .jobs (an sTLD) has been violated. But I suspect we’ll see more of this sort of backlash as new top level domains are introduced in the coming years.


© DomainNameWire.com 2010.

Get Certified Parking Stats at DNW Certified Stats.

Related posts:

  1. .Jobs Expansion Approved, .Travel to Release 1 and 2 Character Domains
  2. Battle Over .Jobs is Growing
  3. The .Jobs Backlash Has Begun

Battle Over .Jobs is Growing

July 14, 2010.jobs, Domaining, Domainnamewire, employ media, Policy & LawComments Off on Battle Over .Jobs is Growing

.Jobs debate “ends” Thursday.

I wrote last month about a move to open up the .jobs domain name. Currently only companies can register .jobs domains, and only with their company name (e.g. ATT.jobs). The group behind this sponsored TLD wants to open it up, with the idea of creating a ton of (million?) job boards using the domains. From Policy.jobs:

Previously, Employ Media [which runs .jobs under contract] began the process of creating a self-managed class of names in the .jobs tld. Called the shared domain beta test, many non-”companyname” .jobs domains were (and in many cases still are) registered to Employ Media. Employ Media “used” these domains in the DNS by redirecting them to a third party (the Direct Employers Association), who themselves “used” the domains by providing uniform, consistent content to all the domains in the shared beta test.

Essentially, .jobs has found a backdoor way to enter as an sTLD and create a structure that will allow it to operate as an open gTLD before other new gTLDs are launched, if its plans are approved. And, much like .travel, average joe’s probably won’t be able to get their hands on the good domain names because they will be kept under an arrangement with the registry to create job boards.

Plenty of people have voiced their opinions in a public comment period that ends tomorrow. It seems that most of the opposition is coming from job board owners, who complain both of new competition and lack of transparency. Those in favor include some members of Society for Human Resource Management, which makes policy decisions regarding .jobs under the .jobs charter. Of course, the .jobs registry and operator Employ Media stands to profit from this move.


© DomainNameWire.com 2010.

Review and rate domain name parking companies at Parking Judge.

Related posts:

  1. The .Jobs Backlash Has Begun
  2. www.ATT.jobs? Seriously.
  3. .Travel, .Jobs domain names closer to fruition