:: domaining business blog // Domaining for Domainers

Archive for the ‘’ Category

iPhone App Developer Loses .Me Domain Dispute

November 13,, Domaining, Domainnamewire, howard neu, Policy & Law, project.meComments Off on iPhone App Developer Loses .Me Domain Dispute (the company) fails to capture domain name.

Here’s a follow up to a story back in September — iPhone App developer has lost its attempt to get the domain name through domain arbitration.

After failing to acquire the domain name from its owner, the company filed a complaint with World Intellectual Property Organization, arguing that the domain name infringed on its applied-for trademark.

The three person arbitration panel determined (.doc) that the domain’s registrant, Alan Lin, had not registered the domain in bad faith for two separate reasons. First, Lin registered a number of other generic .me domain names during the .me landrush, and it was clear he wasn’t targeting the iPhone app developer. Second, Lin actually applied for the domain prior to’s existence, even though the domain wasn’t technically registered until afterward:

The Respondent applied for registration of the disputed domain name during the Land Rush application period for the .me domain, on June 26, 2008 – three months before the Complainant’s trademark registration was entered in the German trademark Register, three weeks before the Complainant even applied for its trademark registration, and two weeks before the Complainant even came into legal existence. The Respondent could not, therefore, have been aware of the Complainant’s existence, let alone aware of the Complainant’s trademark rights, at the time the Respondent applied for registration of the disputed domain name.

Another interesting aspect to the case is that the panel found that the domain name was confusingly similar to the company’s trademark. The panel cited prior cases where panels ignored the top level domain, which would have required it to consider the domain string as “project” instead of “”. But this panel disagreed with prior panels, noting that .me has been marketed as being about “me”, rather than just as a country code identifier, and should be considered. (This could create problems for future panels that wish to ignore the top level domain.)

Lin was represented by domain name lawyer Howard Neu.

© 2009.

Review and rate domain name parking companies at Parking Judge.

Related posts:

  1. Not-So-Uniform Domain Dispute Resolution Policy
  2. WIPO publishes domain name dispute results summary
  3. Sky Broadcasting Loses Domain Dispute over

Are you Kidding .Me? in Domain Dispute

September 18, 2009Domaining, Domainnamewire, Policy & Law,, udrp, wipoComments Off on Are you Kidding .Me? in Domain Dispute

Another crazy domain name dispute.

A company has filed for arbitration on the domain name at World Intellectual Property Organization.

Confused? So was I. Claiming rights to the term “Project” seems like a stretch.

I did a little research and here’s what I’ve come up with. All searches for the complainant, GmbH, lead to a software company at I emailed the current domain registrant to see what’s going on. As he explained it, contacted him to try to buy the domain. They couldn’t agree on the price, so (the company) filed the UDRP.

It’s a very long shot that they’d prevail in this case. It would take some luck getting an arbitrator who’s asleep at the wheel. The bad will may be harder to swallow; is active in the social networking scene. did not respond to a request for comment.

© 2009.

Review and rate domain name parking companies at Parking Judge.

No related posts.